<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arizona v. Gant ruling at Supreme Court: Police must have reason to search vehicle, not just an arrest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stash.norml.org/arizona-v-gant-ruling-at-supreme-court-police-must-have-reason-to-search-vehicle-not-just-an-arrest/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stash.norml.org/arizona-v-gant-ruling-at-supreme-court-police-must-have-reason-to-search-vehicle-not-just-an-arrest</link>
	<description>The Growing Truth About Cannabis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/arizona-v-gant-ruling-at-supreme-court-police-must-have-reason-to-search-vehicle-not-just-an-arrest/comment-page-1#comment-17271</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=6859#comment-17271</guid>
		<description>Im so excited bout the Supreme Court v. Gant ruling...my husband was indicted yesterday based off of what the police found in his truck after he was arrested for a misdemeanor traffic warrant. We are gunna beat this mess...good luck to all in similar situations...finally we are getting some civil rights back!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im so excited bout the Supreme Court v. Gant ruling&#8230;my husband was indicted yesterday based off of what the police found in his truck after he was arrested for a misdemeanor traffic warrant. We are gunna beat this mess&#8230;good luck to all in similar situations&#8230;finally we are getting some civil rights back!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fallibilist</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/arizona-v-gant-ruling-at-supreme-court-police-must-have-reason-to-search-vehicle-not-just-an-arrest/comment-page-1#comment-16917</link>
		<dc:creator>fallibilist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=6859#comment-16917</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’d ask Justice Scalia how he’d explain to Thomas Jefferson the need to harass a citizen for possessing hemp in the first place.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Russ, you fuckin&#039; nailed.  I&#039;m loathe to add anything--just because that line was so goddamn perfect--but my big mouth wants to add these two cents.

Here&#039;s Mr. Jefferson, speaking at his first inaugural, explaining what sorts of things government &lt;b&gt;should&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;should not&lt;/b&gt; do:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Still one thing more, fellow-citizens—a wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Hmm....&quot;restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement...&quot;

There&#039;s no way to get prohibition of pot-smoking out of that.

Scalia used to teach law at the University of Virginia, which was founded by Thomas Jefferson himself.

The so-called &quot;originalist&quot; Scalia needs to get back to his roots.  If Justice Scalia hadn&#039;t sold out his own purported beliefs, he would&#039;ve voted the other way on &lt;i&gt;Raich v. Gonzales&lt;/i&gt; and Charlie Lynch wouldn&#039;t be facing jail for operating a legal dispensary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’d ask Justice Scalia how he’d explain to Thomas Jefferson the need to harass a citizen for possessing hemp in the first place.</p></blockquote>
<p>Russ, you fuckin&#8217; nailed.  I&#8217;m loathe to add anything&#8211;just because that line was so goddamn perfect&#8211;but my big mouth wants to add these two cents.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Mr. Jefferson, speaking at his first inaugural, explaining what sorts of things government <b>should</b> and <b>should not</b> do:</p>
<blockquote><p>Still one thing more, fellow-citizens—a wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm&#8230;.&#8221;restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no way to get prohibition of pot-smoking out of that.</p>
<p>Scalia used to teach law at the University of Virginia, which was founded by Thomas Jefferson himself.</p>
<p>The so-called &#8220;originalist&#8221; Scalia needs to get back to his roots.  If Justice Scalia hadn&#8217;t sold out his own purported beliefs, he would&#8217;ve voted the other way on <i>Raich v. Gonzales</i> and Charlie Lynch wouldn&#8217;t be facing jail for operating a legal dispensary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnL</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/arizona-v-gant-ruling-at-supreme-court-police-must-have-reason-to-search-vehicle-not-just-an-arrest/comment-page-1#comment-16871</link>
		<dc:creator>dnL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=6859#comment-16871</guid>
		<description>Extremely huge.  Even Scalia sided w/ it.  I&#039;m pretty surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely huge.  Even Scalia sided w/ it.  I&#8217;m pretty surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PUAAN</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/arizona-v-gant-ruling-at-supreme-court-police-must-have-reason-to-search-vehicle-not-just-an-arrest/comment-page-1#comment-16868</link>
		<dc:creator>PUAAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=6859#comment-16868</guid>
		<description>This is actually huge...a general move toward strengthening 4th amendment rights would end (I hope) some of the more egregious offenses of law enforcement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually huge&#8230;a general move toward strengthening 4th amendment rights would end (I hope) some of the more egregious offenses of law enforcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

