Open for Questions Round 2: Response | Change.gov: The Obama-Biden Transition Team.During this second round, we decided to leave the voting open significantly longer, but even with that extra time we were surprised to see the final totals: 103,512 people submitted 76,031 questions and cast 4,713,083 votes. We can now be confident that the success of the first round was not just about a new trick, but just a hint of the willingness of the public to permanently change the way they interact with their government. There’s plenty of room to grow.
For this round we refined the process to make it more user-friendly, and broke out the questions into categories. We think this made for a more interesting experience, and ensured that a broader array of questions could get exposure. But we also wanted to try a new way of responding to the questions, so this time instead of text answers, we asked incoming White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs to sit down with us. Since there were so many popular questions in so many categories, we tried to pull out some of them that had been addressed previously by the President-elect or Vice President-elect in order to focus the video portion on questions that haven’t been as specifically addressed during the Transition.
Oh, fantastic! We were all so concerned when the #1 question in the first round of voting was from a citizen in Denton, Texas, who asked, “Will you consider legalizing marijuana so that the government can regulate it, tax it, put age limits on it, and create millions of new jobs and create a billion dollar industry right here in the U.S.?” and you dismissed it with a curt eleven-word response:
President-elect Obama is not in favor of the legalization of marijuana.
So this video response must be the chance you were waiting for to explain more fully your opposition to marijuana legalization, right? After all, of the top five questions in the first round, ours was the only one to get a short dismissal with no explanation. This time, legalization placed fourth overall and top in the National Security category. At last, that Obama promise of transparency in government and responsiveness to the public is about to take root! Let’s go to the video:
Hmm. That’s interesting. Oh, wait, right below the video is this part that says “Previously Addressed Questions” and shows some updates on the Patrick-Fitzgerald-as-Bush-Admin-Special-Prosecutor question, the Israel/Gaza question, and the Taxpayer-Wall-Street-Bailout-Accountability question. OK, it looks like the answers to previously addressed questions will go here.
“Will you consider legalizing cannabis/marijuana/hemp so that the government can regulate it, tax it, put age limits on it, and create millions of new jobs and create a multi-billion dollar industry right here in the U.S.?”—DJ C, Chicago, IL
Open for Questions Response, 12/15/08: “President-elect Obama is not in favor of the legalization of marijuana.”
Wow. It’s condescending dismissal I can believe in. Nothing like transparent and thoughtful responses to an issue that has now twice placed in the top five among the citizens who are responding online.
[...] Later at the beginning of 2009, Obama’s Administration opened up a “second round” of online policy requests and again, marijuana law reform placed in the top five, even with YouTube filtering out some of the “previously answered questions”. This second time the question was completely ignored. [...]
[...] voting on short notice, but here are a couple of websites discussing the results of the first and second round of questions as far as the topic of marijuana is concerned. Marijuana legalization placed [...]
Fixed ‘em for ya, Dick. — “R”R
Oops. I screwed up the block quotes. The inner block quote should be normal text.
Oh yeah, at least he may not legalize it and tax it.
-ED
This needs to be restated so that Mr. Obama’s true position is more clearly stated:
But, Mr. Obama, you promised us hope.
That’s right. And I gave you hope. If I hadn’t given you hope, you wouldn’t be so disappointed right now.
Hope is not what we need. We need real leadership and dedication to the principles of freedom on which our country was supposedly founded.
-ED
it should say
Obama is not in favor of creating millions of new jobs and create a multi-billion dollar industry right here in the U.S.