
Remember, officers, when you're approaching the dangerous potheads' back door with your guns drawn, keep your finger outside the trigger.
Looks like somebody is back from vacation:
Ottawa County, MI —
Deputy Ryan Huizenga will return to work at the Ottawa County Sheriff’s Office this morning, April 14, Undersheriff Greg Steigenga said Tuesday.
Huizenga will be assigned to administrative duties while the department continues its internal review of the March 11 incident, in which Huizenga shot and wounded an unarmed college student, Derek Copp, during a drug raid at Copp’s off-campus apartment.
Huizenga was originally placed on unpaid leave on Monday, April 6, following the announcement that he would be charged with careless use of a firearm.
He was arraigned on that charge Monday, April 13, in Holland District Court.
Well, of course! Innocent until proven guilty and all that. Besides, if he’s behind a desk maybe he won’t shoot any more unarmed pot smokers.
It’s even more fun to read some of the comments:
“it is unfortunate that there are those who want to continue to vilify an otherwise good person over an accident and a blip in his apparently normal good judgment.”
“Being a Deputy is a JOB not a favorite past time or hobby. No different than any of us. He gets up and goes to work. The only difference is he has contact with the public and the machine he is in charge of is on his belt. But in the end he was still just doing his job and had an accident. The only difference between him and us is his bosses are the justice system and he is being tried in the papers. And that my friends in itself should be a crime.”
“the search warrant to raid Copp’s home was legitimate and was based on previous marijuana sales at his apartment. plain and simple he is a drug dealer maybe a small one but still a drug dealer”
“I’m certain Officer Huizinga was operating under the premise that there was more than two teaspoons (or tablespoons depending on what you’ve read) of pot involved.”
You may think I’m pissed at Deputy Ryan Huizenga, but really, you could plug in any police officer’s name in from any of the countless stories of these paramilitary marijuana raids and it would be the same. This story differs in that the victim lived and had such an absurdly low amount of pot, but I see comments like these on drug raid stories all the time, all with a theme of “cops just doing their job” and “those people knew doing drugs was dangerous” to soothe away any recognition that we’ve come to a place in America where we believe it is normal and necessary to send armed urban warriors of the state to break down people’s doors for smoking pot in their own home!
“He’s a drug dealer,” but what exactly is that? I had a friend in Idaho who was “my guy”. He grew weed, I’d buy some. He was married, employed, paid taxes (at least, on his legit income). He sold to me and maybe a few others, just a hobby to make money on the side. He’s doing time now as a “drug dealer”, cellmates with a member of the Mexican Mafia who has numerous assaults and thefts and one manslaughter on his record, but is currently doing time as a “drug dealer” for trafficking in hundreds of pounds of crystal meth. They’re both “drug dealers”, but there’s only one of them I’d trust in my home. My “drug dealer” wasn’t taking advantage of my addiction by turning me into a meth freak or a crackhead – we were old buddies from the music scene who both liked to smoke pot!
But because we envision the Tony Montanas and Pablo Escobars and call every young person shuffling a dime bag a “drug dealer”, and because we parade the “faces of meth” and homeless junkies on the streets on our TVs and call every college kid smoking a joint a “drug user”, it’s all justified, it’s all OK. It’s just Deputy Huizenga doing his job and having an accident at work, instead of the inevitable tragedy that is going to occur when you put well-armed men in unnecessarily high-stress environments in the dark.
We were victims of a raid once. 5 deputies came here to the farm with an arrest warrant looking for an ex-con on parole who violated his parole. There was nobody here but my 15 year old step daughter and 7 year old niece, so they forced their way in.
The person they were looking for didn’t live here and I don’t know him, yet the police entered the house, searched and took all the firearms in the house. (They didn’t find the stash) They next accused the two girls of hiding this person, stating that they were lying because he was their father. They tossed the 7 year old to the floor, claiming that she was lying, even though she kept telling them that the person was not her father and she told them who her father was. They still insisted that she was lying.
They took all the firearms, a collection that would make your pipe collection pale in comparison and continued to harass my significant other by following closely behind her when she left for work until she got to the county line.
We sued for harassment. We not only got the firearms back, but now the 5 deputies are not allowed here on this property (restraining order).
I guess they will have to be absolutely sure of their facts before they try something like that again or hire some new deputies to come here now. Perhaps they will think twice … These folks have teeth and know how to use them.
This story about Huizenga makes me think. What if they would have had one of those “accidents” when they raided us?
As a result of this incident, all the kids, nieces and nephews were taught a few new phrases.
“I do not consent to a search.” “Can I call our lawyer.” “If you don’t have a warrant, obey the two “No Trespassing” signs you passed on the way to the house”, or they have been instructed to do nothing further than identifying themselves then remain silent on all other questions.