MrSpof hails from the Gulag Commonwealth of Virginia where he has been burning the sweet leaf for 28 years (and counting). The utter hypocrisy, injustice, and lies from our government about cannabis are the fuel firing my passion and NORML's kind hosting of my news posts and rants gives me an outlet for that passion. If you're reading this, you CAN make a difference. Donate to the acronym of your choice (NORML, MPP, DPA, etc), come out of the cannabis closet as much as you can, and make YOUR voice heard!

5 responses to “Dr. Earleywine Argues For The Use Of Medical Marijuana”

  1. fallibilist

    I hate to criticize someone who’s on the side of the angels, but I really think that Dr. Earlywine’s presentation-style needs work.

    Frankly, he seems too enthusiastic about cannabis. He used words like “great” to describe marijuana’s effects and said “I’d love” to see it prescribed from behind the counter. I guess the worst part was his tone; it sounded exuberant. Now, on any normal subject, that would be fine. But the reality is that we have to undo years’ worth of Cheech, Chong, and Kumar stereotypes. Having a suit-and-tie-wearing MD on TV is a great start. But now he has to use a tone of voice that takes himself extremely seriously just as his opponent did. It’s unfortunate, but that’s what we expect from doctors in American culture. Even though Earlywine had facts and logic on his side, Kleber sounded like he did. I’m afraid it’s Kleber who emerged victorious from the Thunderdome.

  2. dnL

    Sorry for this being a little off-topic but: Why is it whenever the news shows someone smoking either a blunt or a joint, it’s always the sorriest example of a blunt/joint (e.g. limp, loose, poorly rolled, no crutch, etc.)? I rarely see people smoke such ugly blunts and joints, I thought people take pride in their rolling skills.

    Anyway, Dr. Earleywine came off as the more sensible person in the discussion, while Kebler played a grumpy old man persona. I half expected him to yell, “get off my lawn!”

  3. TalladegaTom

    Animal studies to determine gateway status?!
    How exactly does THAT work? :-(
    I can’t envision any animal able to manufacture a drug and get hooked on it all by themselves.
    *sigh*
    Maybe if they find Bigfoot with signs of meth use, they might have something, but…..

    side note
    I feel for the poor critters that had to be in such a horrible study to begin with. :unlove:

  4. Daniel

    Everyone should send an email to the email address at the end :-P

Leave a Reply

:-) :-| :-( :-D :-o 8-) :-x :-P more »