<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Not your father&#8217;s pot!&#8221; &#8211; The Myth of Cannabis Potency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stash.norml.org/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stash.norml.org/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency</link>
	<description>The Growing Truth About Cannabis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus McPuff</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/comment-page-1#comment-58483</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus McPuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=977#comment-58483</guid>
		<description>Safe, i tried me some 25% THC one and in all honest i prefer good old 10%, you know where you are with standard.

but anyway, i thought the thing they were crying about was more that there is now less of the anti-psychotic chemical in bud now than there was to counteract the &quot;possible weak casual correlation between heavy THC use and the worsening of predisposed mental illness&quot; ?????? have we got any figures on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safe, i tried me some 25% THC one and in all honest i prefer good old 10%, you know where you are with standard.</p>
<p>but anyway, i thought the thing they were crying about was more that there is now less of the anti-psychotic chemical in bud now than there was to counteract the &#8220;possible weak casual correlation between heavy THC use and the worsening of predisposed mental illness&#8221; ?????? have we got any figures on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Substance abuse &#8220;expert&#8221;: Medical marijuana is a charade &#124; NORML Daily Audio Stash</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/comment-page-1#comment-48780</link>
		<dc:creator>Substance abuse &#8220;expert&#8221;: Medical marijuana is a charade &#124; NORML Daily Audio Stash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=977#comment-48780</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s not.  Marijuana may be twice as potent as it was in the 1960s, if that.  And marijuana kills how many people annually?  Oh, yeah, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s not.  Marijuana may be twice as potent as it was in the 1960s, if that.  And marijuana kills how many people annually?  Oh, yeah, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reefer Mad in Aspen &#124; NORML Daily Audio Stash</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/comment-page-1#comment-38256</link>
		<dc:creator>Reefer Mad in Aspen &#124; NORML Daily Audio Stash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=977#comment-38256</guid>
		<description>[...] do I get me some of that 60% THC pot?  Most good bud is around 7%-10% THC with exceptions found as high as 35%.  Even seized hash has been averaging only around 20% THC.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do I get me some of that 60% THC pot?  Most good bud is around 7%-10% THC with exceptions found as high as 35%.  Even seized hash has been averaging only around 20% THC.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/comment-page-1#comment-37291</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=977#comment-37291</guid>
		<description>very nice artical, i liked flava flavs quot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice artical, i liked flava flavs quot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/comment-page-1#comment-23057</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 22:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=977#comment-23057</guid>
		<description>Hah, this argument about the THC potency increasing so greatly these days was JUST used recently on the news. Funny how some things never change...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah, this argument about the THC potency increasing so greatly these days was JUST used recently on the news. Funny how some things never change&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skunk:a new danger? &#171; Hempyreumenglish&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/comment-page-1#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Skunk:a new danger? &#171; Hempyreumenglish&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=977#comment-427</guid>
		<description>[...] http://stash.norml.org/2008/05/27/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://stash.norml.org/2008/05/27/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/" rel="nofollow">http://stash.norml.org/2008/05/27/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "Radical" Russ</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/comment-page-1#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>"Radical" Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=977#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the correction, Matt.  The post is updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the correction, Matt.  The post is updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/comment-page-1#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=977#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Nicely done as always Radical Russ.

&quot;If Ms. Kay really wants to be frightened, she should compare the legal synthetic THC products, Marinol and Sativex, which are 100% pure THC, to the dreaded “skunk”.&quot;

FYI, Sativex is not synthetic, nor is it 100 per cent THC.  It is a whole cannabis extract, complete with all the flavinoids and terpinoids, with hemp extract added 
to bring the THC/CBD ratio to 50/50.

http://www.cannabishealth.com/issue04/#gw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely done as always Radical Russ.</p>
<p>&#8220;If Ms. Kay really wants to be frightened, she should compare the legal synthetic THC products, Marinol and Sativex, which are 100% pure THC, to the dreaded “skunk”.&#8221;</p>
<p>FYI, Sativex is not synthetic, nor is it 100 per cent THC.  It is a whole cannabis extract, complete with all the flavinoids and terpinoids, with hemp extract added<br />
to bring the THC/CBD ratio to 50/50.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cannabishealth.com/issue04/#gw" rel="nofollow">http://www.cannabishealth.com/issue04/#gw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Il falso mito della marijuana di una volta&#8230; &#171; Hempyreum&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://stash.norml.org/not-your-fathers-pot-the-myth-of-cannabis-potency/comment-page-1#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Il falso mito della marijuana di una volta&#8230; &#171; Hempyreum&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stash.norml.org/?p=977#comment-423</guid>
		<description>[...] canapa più facili da reperire illegalmente. Molti pensano, spiega un’approfondita analisi di NORML, che l’erba di oggi è molto più potente di una volta. Dagli anni Sessanta in qua la [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] canapa più facili da reperire illegalmente. Molti pensano, spiega un’approfondita analisi di NORML, che l’erba di oggi è molto più potente di una volta. Dagli anni Sessanta in qua la [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

