The President of Colombia said he would support the global legalization of marijuana, but that his country could not be the one to lead the way. In a Sunday interview, Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos called for the global legalization of marijuana, but said his country could not be the one to lead the way. Santos also called for a tougher, smarter approach to international drug trafficking and hard drug use. President Santos said that the world needs to discuss new approaches since we have been basically thinking within the same framework for the last 40 years.

See original here:

Colombian President Calls for the Global Legalization of Marijuana

Arizonans will vote next week on proposition 203, the ballot measure to legalize medical marijuana in the border state. It is a question of timing, but the DEA is hosting it’s “Red Ribbon Week” this week to spread their anti-drug message in schools across the state

Go here to read the rest:

DEA Celebrates Red Ribbon Week Before November 2nd Elections

In a nod to all of our Canadian stashers, today’s toker -tune turns Canadian politics into a folksy country ballad. The Green Outlaws are a band with a mission, to get Canada to legalize and stop this push to ramp up Canada’s drug war. From their own words, they simply want to stop criminalizing cannabis consumers.  Canada has an even higher majority of citizenry that want to end the war on cannabis, but the lawmakers are clinging on to old drug war strategies.

Today’s tune takes direct aim at Canada’s Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, the conservative party leader who has been in power since 2006. Harper’s administration has continued to move farther and farther away from legalization when it comes to cannabis. West Coast Canadian Bud is the stuff of legends and it is time that Canadian citizens are able to legalize one of their most profitable exports and take their place in the emerging cannabis industry as a world leader. Prohibition must be ended in the North American Continent to end the violence south of our borders, and to end criminalizing North Americans citizens regardless of what latitude you happen to reside.

Band leader Red, “Sticky Fingers” Clay says asks that why, after poll after poll  show a strong support of legalizing cannabis has Stephen Harper continued to move in the opposite direction? He calls the Green Outlaws music a “lighthearted attempt to point out this mis-direction and portray cannabis consumers in a fair and accurate light.” “Everybody volunteered their time,” say Clay about the other members of the band. “We feel very strongly about what we are doing. We’re not kids. We’ve seen this nonsense for 40 years now, and enough is enough.

The Band’s new single, “I Wish Stephen Harper Would Smoke A Joint” even plays on the information that Prime Minister Harper is a John Lennon Fan, letting him now that if John Lennon were alive, he wouldn’t be a fan of his. The song is great, and it is becoming an underground hit. Post it on your own page, or send a link to your Canadian friends, or that girlfriend that you had back in junior high. Visit GreenOutlaws.com for as much information that we have about the Outlaws.

Download audio file (GreenOutlaws_ I Wish Stephen Harper Would Smoke a Joint.mp3)

Download Link: Secret Stash - Register to access

Daily Toker Tunes and live chat available every even hour (Pacific) from 8am-10pm.

Our new format at NORML SHOW LIVE runs from 8am-10pm Pacific Time, with Daily Toker Tunes playing for an hour between the replays of the most recent show.  So many people have asked the names of the songs played that I’m posting the list here every day for your reference.

If you’d like to get your band or favorite tune played in the Daily Toker Tunes rotation, just send me an email to stash@norml.org with the subject Toker Tunes and I’ll forward it to our volunteer music editors for review.  Remember your tune needn’t necessarily be about cannabis – we also love tunes about freedom, justice, civil rights, and more.

Today for your toker-friendly tune we get to enjoy a legend and an icon in the marijuana movement. Although this song isn’t about weed, it IS sung by Willie Nelson and that qualifies as toker-friendly in my book! Willie is Joined by fellow country music titans, Asleep at the Wheel on this album titled, “Now Playing, Willie and the Wheel”. The song is called “Hesitation Blues.” and has been around since close to the beginning of the twentieth century or earlier in one form or another. Recorded by everyone from Leadbelly to Steely Dan, it was a staple of the early Western Swing bands. Willie Nelson has been a friend of NORML for decades and an inspiration to cannabis activists worldwide. I can’t think of a better way to start my week!

Willie Nelson, Asleep at the Wheel
“Hesitation Blues” (mp3)
from “Willie and the Wheel”
(BISMEAUX RECORDS)

Buy at iTunes Music Store
More On This Album

Download audio file (Willie Nelson – Hesitation Blues.mp3)

The Roots Monday Toker Tune of the Day comes from Cliff Roth and the J.J. Davies band. Originally from the soundtrack of Cliff’s 2003 underground stoner cult movie “The Stoned Channel”, “Hello, My Old Friend (Marijuana)” is a song of yearning and the return of a lost love that is sure to bring a tear to your eye….unless your eyes are already teary from that last huge bong rip you just took.

The songs from “The Stoned Channel” span musical styles, from reggae “Marijuana Party Time”, to the pop/middle-of-the-road spoof, “Those Were The Bongs”, to the folk-rock “Marijuana French Toast”. There’s Indian sitar and New Age too.

Jeffrey J. Davis composed and produced the original songs on The Stoned Channel, collaborating with lyricist and executive producer Cliff Roth.

Check out The Stoned Channel at http://www.stonedchannel.com/.

If you’ve ever had to abstain from cannabis for any period of time. I’m sure you will have no problem relating to the NORML Daily Audio Stash Roots Monday Toker Tune of the Day, “Hello, My Old Friend (Marijuana)”, by Cliff Roth and the J.J. Davis Band.

Download Link: Secret Stash - Register to access

Download audio file (Cliff%20Roth%20and%20the%20J.J.%20Davies%20Band%20-%20Hello)
Download audio file (%20My%20Old%20Friend%20%28Marijuana%29.mp3)

Today’s musical break is going to take us to the country side of the tracks, y’all.  Well, maybe that’s not quite accurate.  While at first glance Jason Boland and the Stragglers’ music may seem easy to stereotype as Texas or Country, intent listening makes it harder to categorize their music easily, revealing the influence of the land and life that got them to where they are.  Boland knows he can’t shy away from questions about how to classify his music but simply states, “The Chinese don’t call it Chinese food, its just food. I’m just making music.” 

Here Jason Boland tells about his baby who loves him when he’s stoned.  He might be talking about alcohol (“knock a couple back” instead of “take a couple drags”, for instance), but a good chorus is a good chorus.

Secret Stash - Register to access

Download audio file (Jason%20Boland%20and%20The%20Stragglers%20-%20When%20I’m%20Stoned.mp3)

“You express a great deal of anxiety over our willingness to break laws. This is certainly a legitimate concern. Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court’s decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools, at first glance it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws. One may well ask: “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?” The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all.”

Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.”

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Letter from a Birmingham Jail
April 16, 1963

Today our nation honors what would’ve been this week the eightieth birthday of the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., on the eve of the inauguration of Barack Hussein Obama as the 44th president of these United States.  I was sixty-four days old when an assassin’s bullet cut down Dr. King in the prime of his life.  Today I am six-hundred forty days older than Dr. King when he was killed.  Tomorrow I will see something few people my age and older thought we’d ever see, yet something Dr. King had dreamed from the start.

There remains a grave injustice to be battled, the most unjust of laws to be disobeyed, a law that by its definition is not rooted in eternal law and natural law: the man made code that declares nature itself to be illegal, the prohibition on cannabis.  Yet when I mention marijuana law reform in the context of the great civil rights struggles in America, so many are quick to dismiss me with snickers of derision.  ”You just want pot legal so you can get high!” is a common refrain.

Marijuana law reform is a civil rights struggle.  I will not attempt to equate this struggle to those of minorities, women, or gays and lesbians; however, there are some parallels among our fight and theirs and, indeed, some threads of drug law injustice are woven directly into the struggles of these groups.  The prohibition of drugs was one of the tools of oppression – the “Negroes” for their cocaine, the “Chinamen” for their opium, and the Mexicans for their marihuana.  It remains so today – while people use drugs at about the same rate regardless of race, African-Americans and Hispanics are disproportionately arrested, convicted, and serve longer sentences for drug use than white people.

Aside from the racist nature of the origins and applications, cannabis prohibition itself is an unjust law.  First consider that it isn’t merely against the law to possess, cultivate, traffic, buy, and consume marijuana – it is against the law to be marijuana.  Federal and state law enforcement spend millions of dollars and thousands of hours flying helicopters attempting to spot cannabis growing out in the wild.  Ninety-eight percent of what is seized is known as “feral hemp”, which is wild ditchweed with unsmokably-low levels of THC.  Officials rip up and destroy every plant they see whether it is owned or tended by any human, whether or not it could possibly intoxicate any human.   Logically, then, the ultimate goal of marijuana prohibition is not to simply stop humans from using it for intoxication, but to eradicate the species cannabis sativa L. from the earth!

Think of that: our official policy is the extinction of a species of life.  Certainly that’s not entirely new.  We’re dedicated to the extinction of all manner of microscopic life, after all, but that is a justifiable policy for self-preservation – we kill bugs that kill us.  I cannot think of another plant or animal we treat like cannabis.  Deadly plants like nightshade and belladonna are legal, annoying plants like poison ivy and poison oak are legal, even intoxicating plants like coca and poppy are legal when cultivated for prescription medications.  But the cannabis plant, the plant that cannot kill you is completely illegal*.  The plant that can provide the food, clothing, shelter, and medicine humans need to survive is illegal.  Nature itself is illegal.  How much more contrary to eternal law and natural law could this unjust prohibition law be?

The fight against cannabis prohibition, against this unjust law, is a civil rights fight.  This declaration will offend some people who will point to four centuries of slavery and Jim Crow, to lynchings and cross burnings, and to beatings and firehoses and condemn my declaration as making light of the plight of those who were truly oppressed.  I do not make light of those struggles, but I also recognize that civil rights are not a zero sum game and the degree and manner in which one is being oppressed are not what make the fight against oppression a just one.  Dr. King dreamed of a day when children would be judged by not by the color of their skin but the content of their character; I dream of a day when workers are judged not by the metabolites in their urine but the quality of their work.

Later in King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail, he writes:

Let us consider a more concrete example of just and unjust laws. An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. This is difference made legal. By the same token, a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow and that it is willing to follow itself. This is sameness made legal. …

I hope you are able to see the distinction I am trying to point out. In no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law, as would the rabid segregationist. That would lead to anarchy. One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty. I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law. …

The unjust law of marijuana prohibition is difference made legal.  The majority compels our minority to forgo our intoxicant, but does not bind itself to forgo their intoxicant.  The majority compels our minority forgo our medicine, but does not bind itself to forgo their medicine.  The majority compels our minority to forgo their religious sacrament, but does not bind itself to forgo their religious sacrament.  The majority compels our minority to forgo our source of food, fuel, and fiber, but does not bind itself to forgo their sources.

The majority may argue that they do not prohibit intoxication, medication, religious sacrament, or food, fuel, and fiber cultivation, so long as it doesn’t involve marijuana.  This to me sounds like the argument against same-sex marriage rights, that gays and lesbians are just as free to marry someone of the opposite sex as everybody else.  If we are given a right, but then proscribed from exercising that right in the manner that benefits us without a valid reason from the majority, it is not really a right.  When intoxication, medication, and sacrament are legal rights, but we are proscribed from using a demonstrably safer intoxicant, medicine, and sacrament, that is difference made legal.

No, we do not face the firehoses and the dogs and the lynchings, nor do we suffer in as great of numbers as did the African Americans Dr. King so graciously led in the years before my birth.  Our oppression is more subtle and codified into laws that restrict our housing, employment, and educational opportunities.  We do not tremble in fear of the midnight ride of white-robed vigilante Klansmen; our terror comes in the form of midnight no-knock raids of body-armored SWAT teams.

Like the civil rights struggles of the past, we work to change laws that oppress people, laws that enjoy support from the majority and are rationalized by tradition, religion, and junk science.  Unlike the civil rights struggles of the past, our constituency is an invisible group defined by lifestyle, not genetics.  That choice to use cannabis should not disqualify our fight to be treated as equals under the law.  After all, the choice to worship the God of your understanding is not genetic, it is a lifestyle choice as well, and our law recognizes that one cannot be discriminated against for that choice.  In fact, it is a bit ironic that one’s choice of God, a belief that cannot be proven by science to beneficial, is a protected right, yet one’s choice of cannabis, a plant that can be proven by science to be beneficial, is a federal crime.

The freedom to worship, of course, is an explicit right recognized by our First Amendment, but its foundation is in the inalienable rights given to us by our Creator, among them being Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness.  If that last one – the Pursuit of Happiness – doesn’t give me the right to smoke a joint so long as I don’t affect anyone else’s Life and Liberty, then the Constitution isn’t worth the hemp paper on which it was drafted.

Also from King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail, he writes:

We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was “legal” and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was “illegal.” It was “illegal” to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany. Even so, I am sure that, had I lived in Germany at the time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers. If today I lived in a Communist country where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I would openly advocate disobeying that country’s antireligious laws.

Today’s freedom fighters are the people like Eddy Lepp and Charles Lynch, providing aid and comfort to the sick and dying by growing and supplying them with medicine, only to face the rest of their natural lives behind bars because what they did was “illegal”.

Today’s “whites-only” establishments are the “drug-free” workplaces keep cannabis users confined to low-paying part-time or temp service jobs, while the rest of the workers are allowed all the alcohol, nicotine, and prescription medications they desire.

Today’s lynchings are the Rachel Hoffmans and Jonathan Magbies who are murdered by police negligence, solely over their use of cannabis.  Today’s institutionalized discrimination is the over 20 million in my lifetime whose lives are marked with the scarlet letter of a drug conviction, affecting their child custody, government assistance, college financial aid, employment opportunities, professional licenses, voting rights, and liberty.

The prohibition of cannabis ultimately degrades human personality and is against moral law.  It is an unjust law that cannot stand, and we have a moral responsibility to disobey it.  In doing so, we express the highest respect for the law.  On this day when we recognize the greatness of Dr. Martin Luther King’s Dream, and on tomorrow, when we see part of that dream fulfilled, remember that we don’t fight to “make pot legal so you can get high”; we fight because the Pursuit of Happiness is our right and caging us for our method of pursuit is unjust.

Smoking pot is our civil right!

Let us all hope that the dark clouds of racial prejudice will soon pass away and the deep fog of misunderstanding will be lifted from our fear drenched communities, and in some not too distant tomorrow the radiant stars of love and brotherhood will shine over our great nation with all their scintillating beauty.

Yours for the cause of Peace and Brotherhood,
Martin Luther King, Jr.

* I recognize that marijuana is legally grown at ElSohly’s lab at the University of Mississippi.  But consider that marijuana’s two purposes – to supply five people grandfathered in to the IND program and to provide marijuana for studies to prove how awful marijuana is to justify its prohibition.  In this metaphor it would be akin to saving a few vials of polio virus so you could use them to make vaccines.

He played a little bit of this tune for me, “The Hit That Makes You Cough” and I was ready to sing along the obvious next line (“is the hit that gets you off”), except he was bound and determined to have me prove that line of the song, so I was coughing at the time.

You can get more Chief Greenbud music at myspace.com/cgb.

By the way, the “Chief” part is a verb, not a noun.  As in “to chief (to smoke) green bud”.

Secret Stash - Register to access

Download audio file (Chief%20Greenbud%20-%20The%20Hit%20That%20Makes%20You%20Cough.mp3)