Dr. Drew Pinsky, the Celebrity Rehab / Loveline guy, is getting a lot of flack for his recent comments about Lindsay Lohan.  (If you’re reading this, doctor, you are welcome any time on our show to defend yourself live.)  You can imagine with my hectic 4/20-week travel schedule (2,000 miles in 6 days with LA this weekend) when I’m scanning headlines on the BlackBerry, my brain’s spam filters drop anything with “Lindsay Lohan” in the summary.

"Would you guys legalize hemp already? They're cutting down my cousins to make juice boxes, for Ent's sake!"

But as I’m riding shotgun with my wife driving us through the incredible Redwood National Park, I find the time to catch up on Twitter.  Scanning through the people I follow I find this plea:

@DannyDanko: RT @SSDP Tell @drdrew that Planting Drugs to Frame People is NOT Acceptable! Sign the petition on facebook:http://bit.ly/9xkF3x

What’s this?  Planting drugs to frame people?  What has Dr. Drew done now?  Alas, the coverage on wireless was too spotty for me to do real web surfing, but coming from Danny and SSDP, I figured I would re-tweet it.

I put my phone down to enjoy the scenery.  Soon it buzzed on my leg, which it does only when I’m getting a text message.  But when I pick it up, I find it’s not a text, but a direct message (DM for the g33ks) on Twitter… from Dr. Drew!

Dr. Drew: Please read before you pass judgment:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-drew-pinsky/if-i-were-lindsay-lohans_b_541648.html
7:20 PM Apr 17th

Now remember, at this point I hadn’t read the actual quote that has gotten him into trouble.  I’ve since found that it was an interview piece in RadarOnline (emphasis mine):

The board certified addiction specialist tells RadarOnline.com, “If she were my daughter, I would pack her car full with illegal substances, send her on her way, call the police, and make sure she was arrested. I would  make sure she was not allowed to get out of jail. I would then go to the judge and make sure she was ordered to a minimum of a three year sobriety program.”

Dr. Drew says it’s highly unlikely that Lindsay will recognize she has a problem and go to rehab of her own accord, “I would say it’s less than a 1% chance of her making the decision to go to rehab. I have said this many times before, I believe that Lindsay will make a wonderful sober person, someday, if she survives this. I absolutely wish no harm to her, but I just have a feeling that something awful is going to happen to her, like she is going to lose a limb. I hope Lindsay gets help before something terrible happens.”

I always knew that kid on the left would end up being a bad influence on that kid on the right.

I have a feeling something awful is going to happen to Lindsay, too, like somebody might pack her car full of illegal drugs in an effort to frame her for enough felonies to force her into rehab.  (Lose a limb?  Really?  Like all the now-one-armed coke-addled starlets of the past?)  First off, I like knowing that at any time, Dr. Drew can get his hands on felony amounts of illegal drugs.  Even better that he has the power to “go to the judge and make sure” he gives her the appropriate sentence of three years of rehab.

One of those times and places when slow download speeds are welcome

But I hadn’t read this yet; I was just getting a direct message from Dr. Drew.  I figured he was just watching his “mentions” on Twitter and auto-sending this to anyone who was propagating the Facebook petition.  I clicked the link anyway and waited the very long time Huffington Post took to download as we cruised down US 101.

If I Were Lindsay Lohan’s Father I Would Go to Any Lengths to Get Her Into Treatment

Addiction is a deadly disease. It is a brain disease that alters the brain’s fundamental motivational drives such that thoughts, judgment and volition become severely distorted and actually serve the abnormal motivational priority of getting and using more drugs. Untreated severe addiction is more likely to kill a patient suffering with the condition than most cancers. Treated Breast Cancers, Prostate Cancer, most Lymphomas, and the vast majority of skin cancers, have a better prognosis than a treated addict. And yet addiction is the only disease I have to convince a patient that they have and more importantly convince the patient that without treatment his or her life is in danger.

Do not let this man anywhere near the trunk of your car!

…I spend my days trying to resurrect lives that have been devastated by this disease, devastation that might have been avoided had someone been sufficiently clear to have gone to the mat for this patient when they were younger and earlier in their disease. Family members have to be willing to go to any lengths and unfortunately this often means bringing about circumstances that restrict that individual’s freedom.

…[W]hen I was asked as a father, if I were in Michael Lohan’s position, what would I do to help my daughter, I am clear that I would go to any lengths to get her to and retain her in treatment. Bringing legal consequences to bear is often the only alternative. It would kill me but I would do it. Perhaps I surrendered my equanimity to a flight of journalistic excess by even suggesting that he plant drugs. But if I was in his position and I knew she was addicted (which I personally do not) and all else had failed, I suspect I would contemplate even this as a last resort.

Let me be clear I am not suggesting this as a routine intervention but we frequently enlist law enforcement when we have exhausted other measures. To those of you who reacted in outrage when I made this suggestion, I will remind you that millions of you watched the first season of Sober House when as difficult as it was for her, the house manager, Jennifer Gimenez, summoned police to contain Steven Adler. We then advocated for long-term treatment as an alternative to imprisonment; an enlightened judge granted this, and today as a result Steven is sober and thriving. Were it not for this intervention, as miserable as it was for Steven, I believe he would have soon succumbed to his addiction.

"Lindsay, dear, I think you still have a little bit of powder on your boob..."

The first of many thoughts to come to mind when reading this is if the prognosis for treated addicts is so poor, what’s the motivation to frame them to force them to choose prison or rehab?  The second was that if you have to convince someone they have a problem with drugs, what you’re really saying is you think they have a problem with drugs and they don’t.  The third was that people die from preventable and treatable diseases all the time; we can’t convince them all to get help.  What’s next, chasing around fat people with pitchforks to force them to jog for their own good?  Many more people die from gluttony and sloth than die from addiction and overdose.

Of course, that’s way more than 140 characters for Twitter.  I tried DMing back to Dr. Drew, but he doesn’t follow me so I can’t.  So my only option was to blast my tweet out to the entire Twitterverse as an “@reply” to @DrDrew:

RadicalRuss: OK @drdrew I read it. Judgment: using jail threat to bring you more clients is still wrong. Even if disease, it’s no crime. I’m ACoA, BTW.
7:35 PM Apr 17th via UberTwitter

Much to my surprise, I get a response, again by DM, from Dr. Drew.  Maybe that first one wasn’t an automated reply.  He really is reading my tweets!

Dr. Drew: That’s cool and I have no issue with NORML’s position but as you see using the law helps me for those in dire straights
7:38 PM Apr 17th

Dr. Drew: Or straits that is
7:44 PM Apr 17th

Jeff & Marci Beagley were for convicted of criminally negligent homicide for not getting medical treatment for their 16-year-old son's urinary tract blockage. (Click for source)

So, we’re framing people for their own good?  We’re forcing people to get treatment for their diseases?  Diseased or not, the addict is still a person who is an adult citizen free to make hiser own choices.  For example, suppose Lindsay Lohan decides to leave Hollywood for Oregon City and becomes a Follower of Christ, a fundamentalist Christian sect that believes only in faith healing, no medicines and no doctors.  (There was a high-profile conviction of such a couple in Oregon City for allowing their child to die from an easily treatable condition.  My wife comes from that religion and knew those people personally.)  Suppose she contracts pneumonia and would certainly survive with the most routine medical care, but she steadfastly refuses to go and instead kneels and prays.  Does Dr. Drew then go to any extreme means necessary to force antibiotics into her system against her wishes?  If not, then why does he allow her to choose a religion that will likely kill her, but not a lifestyle that will likely kill her?

But again, too much for Twitter, so I sent this:

RadicalRuss: Also @drdrew you can’t guarantee “enlightened judge” 4 the non-Steven Adlers. Most you’d plant drugs on would get prison (aka “lousy rehab”)
7:48 PM Apr 17th via UberTwitter

Surprisingly, Dr. Drew kept responding:

Dr. Drew: You’d be surprised we get mandated treatment all the time.BTW be clear I am not interested in bumming anyone’s high.
7:50 PM Apr 17th

"The way pot is horticulturally cultivated these days, it clearly has a very powerful opioid effect and very hard to treat." (Click for source)

Where’d that come from?  ”Bumming anyone’s high”?  It’s nice to know Dr. Drew is compassionate about harshing my mellow.  And no, I’m not surprised at all that you get mandated treatment all the time, when the latest Treatment Episode Data Set shows 37.5% of all admissions to rehab for drugs are criminal justice referrals (and 56.9% of all marijuana users in rehab were forced there by a court.)

In response to Dr. Drew’s “using the law helps me” tweet, I sent:

@drdrew Sure it helps, and so would a gun to their head. “Go to rehab, now!” Framing people for their own good is still wrong.
8:25 PM Apr 17th via UberTwitter

I must have touched a nerve, because then Dr. Drew had to pull the “What About the Children!?!” card, the last refuge of the prohibitionist:

Dr. Drew: Are you a father?
8:26 PM Apr 17th

"You heard me, Lindsay. Get yourself into Celebrity Rehab now!"

Ah, yes, I couldn’t possibly understand because I haven’t reproduced.  I can appreciate how a father’s love for his daughter might compel him to do some pretty radical shit, like maybe killing her rapist, or maybe kidnapping and roughing up her pimp, or even maybe planting drugs in her car and narcing her off to the po-po.  How he feels about the harms done to her by herself or others does not legitimize the commission of other crimes in response.

RadicalRuss: @drdrew No I am not a father but my dad was an addict. Him in prison would’ve ruined my life. He CHOSE rehab!
8:44 PM Apr 17th via UberTwitter

Actual story from my hometown paper, The Idaho Statesman, about my dad graduating from college (click for full size)

I’m not ignorant of the whole Twelve Step drug rehab addiction disease modes of thought.  I’m an Adult Child of Alcoholic/Addict (ACoA, they call us) and read many textbooks and attended many groups as my father went through medical detox, 30-day inpatient rehab, and then returned to college at age 40, became president of the Student Social Workers, and got his degree and became a drug and alcohol counselor himself.

Dr. Drew: what if his disease was such that he could not choose and he died and someone could have gotten him in but didn’t
8:51 PM Apr 17th

Exchange the word “gotten” with “forced” and it’s closer to what you mean.  I know that an addict becomes crazy as drugs take over their life.  But if someone has become so insane that they are likely to be self-injurious, we have laws that cover declaring them mentally unstable and mandating forced in-patient treatment in a secure facility (I used to work in one such psychiatric hospital processing that very type of paperwork.)  That doesn’t entail framing them for felonies that will remain on their record and affect their entire life, sober or high.

RadicalRuss: @drdrew It was. He was speed/booze addict on bridge about to suicide when I was 12. Sad if he’d died, but prison wouldn’t have helped.
9:05 PM Apr 17th via UberTwitter

And that was the end of our Twitter conversation, as Dr. Drew hasn’t replied since.  To this day, I would have preferred my dad to jump off that bridge rather than be forced into rehab.  He’d actually been forced, a couple of times, in response to DUIs he’d racked up and cars he had rolled, and those coerced treatment sessions did nothing.

The old joke goes: “How many psychologists does it take to change a light bulb?  One, but the light bulb has to want to change.”  I actually believe in drug treatment – it saved my dad’s life – but I believe even more that taking drugs or being a drug addict is not a crime.  People have a right to make their own decisions, even bad ones.

Driving home tonight, the radio was on a station I don’t normally listen to and the Dr. Drew show was on.  He got a call from a young man, age 23, about to graduate college and become a teacher.  The man admits to smoking marijuana daily since about age 16.  Man wants to know how long he needs to stop smoking pot in order to pass his drug test to become a teacher.  Dr. Drew tells him two months, tells him he is a marijuana “addict”, responds that there is no such thing as “psychological addiction”, says every marijuana “addict” he treats in California has their medical marijuana card (well, duh, who wants to be arrested?), tells the young man that the marijuana “addiction” has put him in denial and led to “drug motivational” thinking because the young man admitted he only wanted to know how long to stop smoking so he could pass and then start smoking again after he became a teacher.

The problem I have with the Dr. Drew show I heard is this reflexive labeling of someone who uses marijuana daily as an “addict”.  This young man sounds like he’s doing OK.  He’s graduating college at age 23, just about right on time.  He’s becoming a teacher.  If he was drinking a beer every day, would he be an alcoholic?  Would his promise to drink beer after he became a teacher be an example of “alcoholic motivational thinking?”  The only problem he has is the illegality of marijuana and the idiocy of collecting people’s urine to judge their fitness for teaching children.

Some people have an unhealthy relationship with cannabis.  According to NIDA, about 9% of users can develop marijuana dependence.  All I ask is that Dr. Drew make it clear that 91% of us are not dependent, we just like to use cannabis!  Like Hunter S. Thompson said, it’s like beer, ice, and grapefruit – you could live your life without it, but why?

To be fair, Dr. Drew also says that if you want to smoke pot, go ahead, he doesn’t want to stop anyone, but if you want to stop and want help he can help you.  (For a hefty fee, of course, though I think he failed to mention that.)    I think he’s probably not in favor of arresting and imprisoning pot smokers.  But when all you’ve got is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail – he’s a drug counselor who sees only the most desperately addicted day after day, so every pot smoker looks like a future client to him.

He also mentioned Marijuana Anonymous.  Now I know my Twelve Steps, Twelve Traditions, Thirteen Articles of Faith (whoops, wrong religion)… my father was an alcoholic and speed addict who then went through recovery, AA, NA, then got a BSW and became a drug and alcohol counselor when I was a teenager.  I can spout Stuart Smalleyisms with the best of them.  I know many people whose lives were saved by that program, but it was never for me – way too quasi-religious for my tastes.

As I read the “Twelve Questions” that Marijuana Anonymous asks regarding marijuana use in an effort to help you understand if you’re an “addict”, I can’t help but notice how many of the questions merely observe an effect of marijuana prohibition, rather than any particular problem with marijuana use.  For example:

#4. Do you find that your friends are determined by your marijuana use? (Well, yes, because outlaws tend to hang with outlaws.  I’d love to have more friends that don’t smoke marijuana, but they tend to be afraid of visiting a home where police may burst in at any moment to arrest “criminals”.)

#7 Does your marijuana use let you live in a privately defined world? (Sure! It’s not often that people who are breaking the law like to make that world public.)

#9 When your stash is nearly empty, do you feel anxious or worried about how to get more? (Yes, because I can’t buy it at a store like a six-pack or a cigar.)

#11 Do you plan your life around your marijuana use? (You mean like avoiding national parks, non medical marijuana states, and states with per se DUID laws while on vacation?  Or finding clandestine places to smoke marijuana?  Sure!)

I also notice how the questions are only scary if you begin with an assumption that regular marijuana use is problematic.  If you asked me some of these “Twelve Questions” about my dog, I could give you “yes” answers, does that mean I’m a Jack Russell Terrier “addict” (I am!)

#1 Has walking your dog stopped being fun?  (Yes, but not always.)

#2 Do you ever play with your dog alone?  (Sure, sometimes being alone with your dog – or getting high alone – is a nice way to relax.)

#3 Is it hard for you to imagine a life without your dog?  (Impossible!)

#6 Do you play with your dog to cope with your feelings?  (He’s the best buddy to have on a down day – just like pot!)

Addiction is a powerful thing and I just hate the way it is tossed about by pop psychologists like Dr. Drew and Marijuana Anonymous.  Yes, there is a consistent theme among those who abuse anything – pot, gambling, sex, shopping, internet, alcohol, heroin, etc. – but “addiction” should be reserved for those substances that alter the body’s chemistry to the point where there is an undeniable physical need for the substance and without it severe complication can arise.  Sorry, but if you force the pot smoker, gambler, shopper, or World of Warcraft player to go cold turkey, they do not risk death, but the alcohol, cocaine, meth, and heroin addict may die.  The former people may have a serious psychological dependence, but the latter people have a physical addiction.

Maybe it’s just me and my love of language.  I feel calling people with marijuana dependence “addicts” cheapens and demeans the people who are truly physically addicted to serious drugs.  (Watching your father kick alcohol and speed cold turkey at age eleven will leave a lasting impression.  Show me the marijuana “addict” puking, trembling, hallucinating, screaming, and crying from not having a joint for three weeks and I’ll buy the “addict” label.)

UPDATE:  Whoops!  Ran out too fast and messed up the links.  Player and download link fixed now. — “R”R

Download the NORML Daily Audio Stash for 2008-09-17

Download audio file (NORML_Daily_AudioStash_2008-09-17.mp3)

Today’s Stash features a Cannabis Science conversation with Dr. Mitch Earleywine regarding the latest claim about adolescent marijuana use and increased risk of schizophrenia.  Then you get Part 2 of Paul Armentano’s interview on the Dr. Drew Pinsky radio show.

I’ve gotta run – I’m hosting Oregon NORML’s first ever Cannabis Cinema Night for registered medical marijuana patients!

Download the NORML Daily Audio Stash for 2008-09-16

Download audio file (NORML_Daily_AudioStash_2008-09-16.mp3)

You get to hear lots of voices on today’s Stash.  First you get audio from the Dr. Drew radio show, with our own Paul Armentano joining Dr. Drew and Bob Forrest to discuss the FBI’s announcement of the fifth straight all-time record number of marijuana arrests in America.

Then I’ve got audio from the Hemposium at Portland Hempstalk.  NORML Legal Committee attorney John Lucy IV, Oregon NORML Legal Counsel Paul Loney, and NORML Founder and Legal Counsel Keith Stroup took audience questions on marijuana and DUI laws.

Download the NORML Daily Audio Stash for 2008-08-05

Download audio file (NORML_Daily_AudioStash_2008-08-05.mp3)

Today we get to visit with Darrel Rogers from Schools Not Prisons PAC, an organization dedicated to electorally slaying the biggest Drug War dragon in the House, Rep. Mark Souder (R-IN).

Then comedian Rob Cantrell (Last Comic Standing) visits with a preview of his show this Thursday in Washington DC with reggae artistrs Lionize.

Plus a couple of snippets from Paul Armentano’s interview on the Dr. Drew Pinsky radio show and Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) on FOX News in support of HR5843.

But I am going to address most of the interview points that the Drug Czar tried to float today… Join me below… in The Rest of the Entry (said in Paul Harvey voice)…

DR. DREW: I guess there’s some more studies out on marijuana and its potency.

DRUG CZAR: Uh, yeah, we’ve had the basic national lab at the University of Mississippi…

You know, the place where the government grows medical marijuana and mails it out in 300-joint tins to four federal patients every month?

DRUG CZAR: …that has been studying potency for a number of years, and again potency’s up, it’s been up quite regularly and now dramatically over the last ten years as a result of a combination of the varieties that are being bred and the way they are being cultivated to maximize the THC content, in the product, so it’s up… yeah, I think this is another case – you know this – a lot of baby boomers my age are thinking about the marijuana they and their friends were exposed to in the early eighties where the recorded THC is down in the 2, 3% maybe… we’re talking about approaching on average more than 9%, and then, of course, as you know varieties that have THC content in the 15, 16, even into the 20s are now available to young people. Unfortunately the consequences are more acute as well.

Ding! All of you playing “Drug Czar Bingo”, go ahead and black out the “Not Your Father’s Pot” square.

DR. DREW: Right, I think that’s the big issue, because of the potency of the drug, just as we increase, say… we create a… people seem to understand that when we create a drug like OxyContin with higher [?], more powerful — “Oh, OK, that’s more addictive” — but somehow the marijuana story flies under the radar, that we’re producing a drug that is increasingly powerful and thereby increasingly addictive…

Wait a minute, doctor. That does not necessarily follow. Science has created all manner of more powerful medicines that are not more addictive, and many of them are less addictive than their predecessors.

And we also know that marijuana is not addictive in the “jonesin’, gotta have a hit” sense. Earlier in his show, Drew admitted one of his pet peeves are people who say a drug is only “psychologically addicting”; Drew says he treats these people with addictions and psychological is as much “addiction” as physiological in his view. (And as the son of an alcoholic father who sweated through delirium tremens while quitting cold turkey from booze all alone in a trailer, it offends me when people compare use “addiction” to describe someone who may be “dependent” on a substance or behavior. “Addiction” is physical slavery, “dependence” is enslaving yourself.)

But even under that definition, marijuana is far less addictive than legal drugs and other illegal drugs. The National Institutes of Medicine reviewed plenty of research and found that “few marijuana users become dependent on it”, less than those who use alcohol or tobacco.

DR. DREW: …and it’s also increasingly dangerous in terms of the side effects. We’re seeing lots more problem with depression – I know you and I did a conference about that – we’re even seeing schizophreniform reactions. The one thing that I’m sort of fascinated by, you know, is that for many people there seems to be a very powerful opiate-like effect of marijuana these days in these very high potencies. Is anyone reporting anything about that?

WTF? Opium-weed?!? Look, whatever scary high-potency marijuana you think people are smoking out here, it’s marijuana that people have always been able to smoke. There have always high-potency strains of marijuana – it’s called sinsemilla, hashish, and hash oil. People would smoke a puff or two of those and get a fantastic high… Why didn’t they get depressed or go schizo?

But if you lived in a area where that was tough to get or too expensive, you got what you could get and you smoked a whole hell of a lot of it to get a decent high (and a headache).

Eventually the prohibition marketplace began to start getting the stronger strains to the buyer, as buyers who were tired of spending too much cash on poor quality marijuana demanded more potency. If you’re really concerned about potency, you regulate marijuana so a buyer can know exactly how much THC he’s getting in his baggie. In the Netherlands, where this is sort of the case, buyers prefer the “mild” and “moderate” strains, much like drinkers here prefer beer and wine over whiskey.

DRUG CZAR: Well, one of the ways that we’re seeing this change is the number of people who have reported marijuana as the reason why they come into an emergency room for acute care – in the past people would think, “Oh, you get overdoses for heroin, you get overdoses for cocaine,” but people had a view that marijuana, because it doesn’t have the same toxicity character that would have you come in for acute care, but the number of cases has gone up dramatically over the last ten years as the potency – they track almost directly with the potency. And the number of cases for people coming in reporting that they had an unexpected reaction or they’re having… sometimes they come in because they are seeing acute dependency and they want a referral to treatment. But a lot of them are having unexpected reactions or – not the same overdose toxicity as heroin – but that has been a surprising development which people almost think, “Well, that can’t happen, there must be some kind of problem.” but they’re reporting health consequences from this…

The statistics he is mentioning come from the Drug Abuse Warning Network, or DAWN. According to their own website, “[D]rugs reported to DAWN come from the [emergency room] medical record or [medical examiner's / coroner's] case file. There are many possible sources for this information: laboratory (toxicology) testing, the clinical assessment and diagnoses, as well as reports by patients, their friends, or their families.” According to their FAQ, “Although overdoses are included in the cases reported to DAWN, many other types of drug-related events are also reported. For example, some drug-related ED visits or deaths may be the result of accidents or injuries. Others may be the result of adverse reactions, drug interactions, or accidental ingestion.”

This means when you go to the E.R. because you sprained your ankle playing softball, and their blood tests show you have marijuana metabolites – that’s an emergency admission for marijuana.

If you’re in a car accident and the admitting physician asks your mom whether you use marijuana and she says, yes – that’s an emergency admission for marijuana.

And, to be fair, if you come in freaking out because some black market dealer laced your marijuana with formaldehyde and you’re really messed – that, too, is an emergency room admission for marijuana, and one that wouldn’t have been if the product was regulated and inspected for quality control.

DRUG CZAR: So the number of young people who come in for treatment, even as young people with the earlier stages of initiation. We have, as you know, the national data collection shows more teens coming in for treatment as teens for marijuana dependency than all other illegal drugs combined in the last five years and more in the last five years than for alcohol, which has always unfortunately been a big problem, young underaged drinking and alcoholism.

He’s absolutely right, because now we have a system of drug courts that sentence young offenders to drug treatment even if they aren’t dependent on marijuana. In fact, according to the government’s own figures, one-third of the people sentenced to treatment for marijuana haven’t even smoked pot in over a month. Ah, the drug so powerfully addictive people can easily go without it for a month!

DRUG CZAR: So the increased strength of this substance is also affecting the path of dependency and health consequences, as well as (you mentioned we talked about earlier) some of the mental health consequences. We’ve been even doing work with the Dutch, who are usually thought of as the opposite side of us on marijuana or cannabis, where they are talking about higher potency causing acute health problems that they are seeing in the Netherlands. So they too now have been taking steps to reduce the number of coffee houses, to treat the especially higher potency cannabis almost as a different drug in their system. So, again, I think multiple places are seeing the same thing, we have, it’s a kind of a cultural blind spot about marijuana that is unfortunately putting more kids at risk.

Well, first of all, if John Walters wants to learn a lesson from the Dutch and institute a policy of tolerance for small personal cannabis sales and use in coffee shops, I’m all for that. But he’s way off base with the characterization of the Dutch reduction in coffee houses. Coffee house numbers are down nationally from around a thousand in the nineties to around 700 today, but primarily because of the pressures of “drug tourism” from countries that do not tolerate personal soft drug use.  Of course, if other countries tolerated marijuana use, there’d be no “drug tourism”.  It’s not about potency; coffee houses still sell high-potency strains like White Widow that test in the 25% THC range.

DR. DREW: It’s interesting that when I treat people for multiple substances – cocaine, alcohol, and pot – the one they really miss is the pot. It creates sort of a… the euphoria from the drug creates sort of a love-type reaction – they love the drug – it’s a nurturing sort of warm feeling they can’t get any other way. And so when they are left without the drug there may be some outside withdrawal, their affect may be stabilizing, but they still miss and romanticize that feeling.

Could it be, Dr. Drew, they miss it because it had wonderfully positive effects for them and an absence of serious negative effects? No alcoholic misses puking on his shoes and the shakes when he can’t get a drink. No coke addict misses nosebleeds, a racing heart, and emptying their bank account for one more eightball. I mean, if you told me that for the rest of my life I couldn’t eat Mexican food, I’d still miss and romanticize about a nice plate of pollo en mole.

DR. DREW: It’s really interesting to me that the Dutch are sort of focusing their attention on this. How are they – well, let’s maybe take it back home here – I’m interested in sort of how they would differentiate between using one kind of pot and the other – what are we doing in this country to try and address this?

DRUG CZAR: One, we’re trying to get more of the word out about marijuana is a dangerous substance of abuse. I think when we had the conference that we did, you and I talked about the, um…

Does it bother anyone else that interviewer and interviewee are so chummy, doing conferences together talking about the evils of marijuana? Just wondering…

DRUG CZAR: One of the problems is just having people overcome the false view that marijuana is not a serious drug of abuse, that this is different. We’ve been trying to help young people see this. We get further when we have consensus. I mean, we have consensus on things like methamphetamine, like crack cocaine, like heroin. We have more to do here, but nobody goes up and says, “Well, you don’t have to worry about that, that’s only psychologically addicting, it’s not physically addicting, or it’s not a dangerous drug of abuse.” We do have that with marijuana, yet we have more people – not just teens, but nationwide – more people coming in for treatment for marijuana dependency as a primary dependency than any other drug in adults and kids combined. And yet, if you say that, people just think there’s something false in the data.

Yes, it must be monumentally difficult to convince nearly 100 million Americans who’ve tried marijuana themselves and for the most part suffered no ill effects that the bullshit you’re peddling is accurate. It must be especially hard to convince the 14 million who’ve smoked in the past month – smoking that same deadly potent marijuana you’re claiming is out there today – that it’ll drive them crazy and into the E.R. when it hasn’t had that effect on them or anyone they know.

The reason you have consensus on meth, crack, and heroin, is because those drugs are dangerous and addictive, and most everyone has seen the story of the meth-mouthed scrap-metal thief, the crackhead woman turning tricks for a rock, and the junkie wasting away in an alley. Nobody has seen that in a stoner. Nobody is too afraid of the worst case scenario (getting plastered to a sofa and eating cookie dough while watching Spongebob) because they know that after even the highest high, the vast majority of stoners return to living productive sober lives.

DRUG CZAR: So we’re trying to talk about marijuana, we’re gonna talk about the reality of young people and marijuana, we’re trying to talk about the research showing the mental health consequences as you helped us with earlier.

That’s funny, because I’ve been reading some of that research, such as Leslie Iverson’s 2005 meta-analysis that looked at most of the research in this mental health arena and concluded “A review of the literature suggests that the majority of cannabis users, who use the drug occasionally rather than on a daily basis, will not suffer any lasting physical or mental harm.” Yes, if you smoke a whole lot of marijuana, and you’re predisposed to psychosis or schizophrenia, cannabis may exacerbate that.  But that’s no reason to prohibit cannabis, any more than we should ban Snickers bars because some people have peanut allergies.

DRUG CZAR: We’re also trying to help more directly cut off some of the availability of marijuana because there also has been a reluctance, I think, sometimes to take seriously the criminal marketing of marijuana, which people think it’s Cheech & Chong, not dangerous guys, but the killers and assassins in Mexico, those mafias, make the bulk of their money – the Mexicans know this, we know this – on marijuana. Yeah, they make money from cocaine and heroin, but the basic paid overhead is paid by marijuana, and that’s just one of the sources.

Oh, no, Mr. Walters, I do take very seriously the criminal marketing of marijuana. That’s why we work so hard at NORML to take the “criminal” part out of the marketing of marijuana.  And how dare you bring up the border drug war in Mexico when it is your policies that have created that war and gotten brave police, judges, and civilians killed in the crossfire because you’ve criminalized Americans who like to smoke a doobie now and then.  If they’re paying their bills through marijuana, why not undercut their income by legalizing the sale of weed within the US?

DRUG CZAR: Again, we’re trying to both influence supply and demand, try to influence people to work on prevention and intervention and treatment for marijuana and not ignore it.  We’re also trying to, and we have stepped up some of the efforts to control the sources of supply, because when they are plentiful and powerful, we get more sick people, as well as when we look the other way and tell kids it’s an expected rite of passage, every generation does this, don’t worry…

DR. DREW: Oh, that is such an anachronism, that drives… you’ve mentioned two of my most… the two things that drive me more crazy than anything else.  One was that drug use and alcohol use by teens should be anticipated as a rite of passage – that is a HORRIBLE idea, a horrible message to young people.  It’s always dangerous and unhealthy.  You look at every unwanted outcome, whether it’s pregnancy or STDs or accidents, you ALWAYS find drugs or alcohol, kids need to get that message.  And the other thing you mentioned, which is the idea of a… whoa, we’re out of time!  This is John Walters, the director of the White House Office of national Drug Policy… but the other thing is the idea of psychological dependence or addiction: things are either addictive or they are not and if they’re addictive, it’s a biological process.

Just because people with unwanted outcomes smoked pot doesn’t mean that smoking pot is going to lead to unwanted outcomes.  Post hoc, ergo prompter hoc, doctor, you should know better.  And in a world where we tell them “Just say no” and “marijuana is going to make you schizo”, we’re more likely to get the unwanted outcomes than if we give them accurate facts about marijuana.

After the commercial break, Dr. Drew comes back with Paul Armentano.  For some reason, Drew didn’t bring up any of the points being touted by John Walters and led him into a tangential discussion about a cannabis-blocking drug being used as a weight loss agent.  After that segment I was able to call in to Drew’s show and address some of the points (“why are we supposed to be afraid of this increased potency marijuana when the federal government allows the prescription of a 100% THC pill called Marinol”, “higher potency was around back in the 1960s and 1970s”, and “they say it’s the smoking that’s bad, and if it’s more potent, you smoke less of it”), and even then he tried to take me on some tangent about a book I’ve never read.

Maybe we’ll have Paul on Dr. Drew’s show again some time.

[12:26] Drug Czar has spit out like five drug war lies in a row. Wow. Dr. Drew is so on his side, too. Sad.

[12:27] “This marijuana is different than the old weed.” Hardest problem is getting past people’s misperceptions – that is, they’ve used it, liked it, and not had problems.

[12:28] Dr. Drew – “I treat multi-drug users and the one they say they miss the most is marijuana – it creates a ‘love’ feeling – they love it.”

Commercial break – Paul’s on next…

Walters touted the “more emergency room visits for pot” line, the “pot dealers aren’t funny friendly guys like Cheech & Chong, drug war in Mexico, assassins…” line, the “more teens in treatment for pot” line… it’ll be like tee-ball for Paul… if Dr. Drew will let him speak.

C’mon, Dr. Drew, don’t be the type of pro-drug-war interviewer I am dreading you’re going to be…

Oh, and what is with Drew talking about marijuana acting more like an opiate?

[12:34] Local break… Paul’s up in a minute…

Paul will be nicer than I would be. I’d note the “kids in treatment” and say, “yeah, because courts sentence them there so guys like you can have a job.”

[12:36] Paul’s on – what about your organization, what’s your goal?

[12:36] Paul: Adults should be able to use small amounts of marijuana for personal use and not go to jail.

[12:37] Drew: Prohibition attempts in the past haven’t worked? Paul: Clear prohibition has led to adverse unintended consequences.

[12:38] Paul: Raise in potency is a prohibition problem.

[12:38] Drew: Why do we cling to idea of good drugs / bad drugs? Paul: We need to talk about relationship with drugs, not the substance per se.

[12:39] Paul: Define USE vs. ABUSE. ONDCP defines all use as ABUSE, not the case for the majority of Americans.

[12:40] Drew: I agree the relationship is unhealthy, not the drug. Morphine and Oxycontin are good in some situations. Paul – maybe we’re Puritanical.

[12:41] Paul: Drug ads all over TV, but other drugs like marijuana so dangerous we can’t even study the therapeutic effects of the drug. Based not on science, but on the stigmatizing of the user.

[12:42] Drew: Problem with research, CB2 receptors… seems like research logjam opened up, you doing anything? Paul: “Emerging Clinical Applications for Cannabinoids”

Paul didn’t get to hear Walters’ segment. I’m psychically screaming, “get to the potency!!!”

[12:43] Drew: the anti-obesity drug that blocks cannabinoid receptors… Paul: list of bad results and trials in England…

Argh, getting too far into the weeds… get to the potency!

Nope. Not going to get there. Drat.

I’m Drew’s first call-in guest! Stay tuned!

[12:56] OK, I was the second call… and THAT WAS FUN!

The show begins in one hour (Noon Pacific / 3pm Eastern) on Westwood One affiliate near you. Or to listen to the live internet stream, go to http://www.1260.am/programming/listen/