The remarks from our Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy on the release of the UN 2009 World Drug Report, which endorsed drug decriminalization in a reversal of previous policy. Guess which 17-letter D-word never gets mentioned once in our “drug czar’s” 781-word statement?

Statement of R. Gil Kerlikowske
Director, National Drug Control Policy
Remarks at Release of the 2009 World Drug Report
June 24, 2009

It is a great pleasure for me to be here with UNODC Executive Director Antonio Costa for the release of the 2009 World Drug Report. I am also pleased that we can be joined today by Michele Leonhart, Acting Administrator of DEA, and William McGlynn, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL). Congratulations to Antonio and his team in Vienna for putting together this very comprehensive document. As the report shows, every nation is affected by the drug problem.

As we approach June 26th, International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Drug Trafficking, it is a good time to reflect on what we can do better. In the United States, we are moving away from divisive “drug war” rhetoric and focusing on employing all the tools at our disposal to get help to those who need it. We recognize that addiction is a disease and are seeking public health solutions. My top priority is to intensify efforts to reduce the demand for drugs which fuels crime and violence around the world.

Read the rest of this entry by clicking here

Related posts

• Drug Czar Kerlikowske calls for end to “War on Drugs” analogy (5)
• Obama taps Seattle Police Chief Kerlikowske for Drug Czar (3)
• Drug Czar Kerlikowske: “Marijuana is dangerous and has no medicinal benefit” (8)

I like the guy already.

(Wall Street Journal) WASHINGTON — The Obama administration’s new drug czar says he wants to banish the idea that the U.S. is fighting “a war on drugs,” a move that would underscore a shift favoring treatment over incarceration in trying to reduce illicit drug use.

In his first interview since being confirmed to head the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, Gil Kerlikowske said Wednesday the bellicose analogy was a barrier to dealing with the nation’s drug issues.

“Regardless of how you try to explain to people it’s a ‘war on drugs’ or a ‘war on a product,’ people see a war as a war on them,” he said. “We’re not at war with people in this country.”

Mr. Kerlikowske’s comments are a signal that the Obama administration is set to follow a more moderate — and likely more controversial — stance on the nation’s drug problems. Prior administrations talked about pushing treatment and reducing demand while continuing to focus primarily on a tough criminal-justice approach.

The Obama administration is likely to deal with drugs as a matter of public health rather than criminal justice alone, with treatment’s role growing relative to incarceration, Mr. Kerlikowske said.

It’s a step in the right direction, but it still begins with the flawed premise that use of marijuana by Americans is something the government needs to reduce.  It’s still the “all use is abuse” model that says if we catch and adult with pot, there needs to be some sanction.  I’m happy they wish to change that sanction from a prison cell to an unnecessary forced treatment bed, but all that accomplishes is a redirection of the drug war money from the prison/industrial complex to the drug testing/rehab industries.

Sen. Tom Coburn, the lone senator to vote against Mr. Kerlikowske, was concerned about the permissive attitude toward marijuana enforcement, a spokesman for the conservative Oklahoma Republican said.

Mr. Kerlikowske said the issue was one of limited police resources, adding that he doesn’t support efforts to legalize drugs. He also said he supports needle-exchange programs, calling them “part of a complete public-health model for dealing with addiction.”

James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, the nation’s largest law-enforcement labor organization, said that while he holds Mr. Kerlikowske in high regard, police officers are wary.

“While I don’t necessarily disagree with Gil’s focus on treatment and demand reduction, I don’t want to see it at the expense of law enforcement. People need to understand that when they violate the law there are consequences.”*

They just can’t get past the moral imperative to punish potheads, can they?  The way prohibitionists see it, they said don’t do it, so you just shouldn’t do it.  There is no questioning of why we shouldn’t do it, no examination of the consequences of doing it versus the consequences of getting caught, and no consideration that doing it may actually be beneficial for some.

Imagine if the government came out and said it was taking steps to reduce drinking by adults – not drunk driving or binge drinking by college kids or alcoholism, but just overall alcohol consumption in this country.  Imagine if anyone found to be intoxicated on alcohol outside their home was considered to be an “addict” and was forced into “treatment” by a court at their own expense.  Imagine entire advertising campaigns showing the reality of people drinking – fights, puking, regrettable one-night stands – with an “Alcohol – Just Say No” theme.

But no, despite over 100,000 deaths per year, thousands of drunk driving incidents, and countless rude and disgusting encounters with drunk people, day after day I see commercials of exceptionally healthy attractive non-drunk people reminding me to “drink responsibly”.  It is assumed that most people are adults who can responsibly handle a drink or two and the few who can’t hold their liquor are just the unavoidable cost of living in a free society.

Why does this “responsible use” model not apply to the mildly psychotropic non-toxic herb that never kills and its largely non-violent responsible adult users?  For marijuana, why must we favor “treatment over incarceration” instead of legalization over incarceration?

Read the rest of this entry by clicking here

Related posts

• Drug Czar Kerlikowski addresses UN report on success of decriminalization, without mentioning decriminalization (7)
• Obama taps Seattle Police Chief Kerlikowske for Drug Czar (3)
• Drug Czar Kerlikowske: “Marijuana is dangerous and has no medicinal benefit” (8)

Download link: NORML Daily Audio Stash for 2009-04-02

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Hemp Headlines

1. Statement by R. Gil Kerlikowske to the Senate at Drug Czar Confirmation Hearings
2. Finally, Some ‘Change’ We Can Believe In!
3. House Passes Measure to Let FDA Regulate Tobacco
4. Gingrich: We should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans

Southern California Cannabis with Tere Joyce

• Degé Coutee from Patients Advocacy Network with update on SF DEA Raid last week.

Daily Toker Tunes by Marijuana Music Awards

• Rockin Thursday! – ‘4:20? by The Bigfellas

Cannabis Conversations

• Keith Stroup, Founder of NORML, discusses the book “High In America” and its look at the politics of marijuana in the 1970’s.

Related posts

• Stash for Thu, Nov 19, 2009 (0)
• Stash for Thu, Jul 2, 2009 (2)
• Stash for Thu, Aug 6, 2009 (4)

President Obama will name Seattle Police Chief R. Gil Kerlikowske as the nation’s drug czar today, ending a long search that was slowed as details of drug arrests involving Kerlikowske’s son came to light.

The administration will remove the job’s Cabinet designation — reversing an elevation of the office under President George W. Bush — although one senior official said that Kerlikowske would have “full access and a direct line to the president and the vice president.” The source also noted that Vice President Biden was instrumental in the creation of the Office of National Drug Control Policy and would continue to be an outspoken advocate on the issue.

Kerlikowske has long been speculated to be the front-runner to serve as the drug czar. But revelations concerning the arrests of his son, Jeffrey, on drug-related charges complicated the process.

The White House acknowledged Jeffrey Kerlikowske’s past drug use but offered no specifics or comment.

In his remarks today accepting the nomination, Kerlikowske is expected to reference his family struggles with drug abuse. “Our nation’s drug problem is one of human suffering,” according to his prepared remarks. “As a police officer, but also in my own family, I have experienced first-hand the devastating effects that drugs can have on our youth, our families and our communities.”

via Seattle Police Chief to Be Named Drug Czar – washingtonpost.com.

It’s nice to see the Drug Czar’s office demoted to a non-Cabinet post again. It’s even nicer that a police chief with experience in one of America’s most cannabis-friendly cities, home to a peaceful annual gathering of 300,000 stoners, and some personal experience with drug problems in his own family is going to be in charge of our drug policy.  I look forward to these confirmation hearings.

Now if we could just change those words “Drug Control” to “Drug Harm Reduction” or “Drug Regulation”…

Related posts

• President Obama appoints Acting Director of Office of National Drug Control Policy (0)
• Obama administration selects Kerlikowske as Drug Czar (0)
• DPA’s Ethan Nadelmann for Drug Czar Petition (1)

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

My interview with NORML Advisory Board and LEAP (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition) Advisory Board Member Norm Stamper, who was the police chief prior to Gil Kerlikowske in Seattle, Washington, on Kerlikowske’s rumored selection as President Obama’s next head of the cabinet-level position of director of Office of National Drug Control Policy.

Related posts

• Obama taps Seattle Police Chief Kerlikowske for Drug Czar (3)
• Stash for Tue, Sep 1, 2009 (3)
• Stash for Thu, Feb 12, 2009 (1)

Tonight: Interview with Kerlikowske predecessor Norm Stamper on Drug Czar appointment – 4:20pm

Download today’s Daily Audio Stash at 4:20pm Pacific when I discuss the potential appointment of Chief Kerlikowske as Drug Czar with his predecessor, former Seattle Police Chief and current member of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, Norm Stamper.

(Seattle P-I) Seattle Police Chief Gil Kerlikowske has accepted a job in the Obama administration, most likely overseeing the nation’s drug policies, according to sources familiar with the chief’s plans.

Kerlikowske, who has led the department for more than eight years, has told the department’s top commanders he expects to leave to take a top federal position, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they aren’t officially authorized to disclose the information.

Sources say Kerlikowske is expected to be named head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, a Cabinet-level position otherwise known as the drug czar. The office, established in 1988, directs drug-control policy in the U.S. It’s subject to Senate confirmation.

Kerlikowske had also expressed an interest in the top job at the federal Drug Enforcement Administration but apparently has not been tapped for that post, one source said.

Kerlikowske won credit for stabilizing the police department after the stormy departure of Norm Stamper as chief in the wake of the 1999 World Trade Organization riots in Seattle, as well as the department’s initial failure to unearth a detective’s alleged theft of money at a crime scene. A genial Kerlikowske reached out to citizens. In addition, crime rates dipped during his time as chief, reaching historic lows in recent years.

Kerlikowske lists one of his accomplishments as the development of less-than-lethal force options for officers, equipping dozens of officers with Tasers. He also oversaw the installation of cameras in the department’s patrol cars.

He has been an advocate of gun control and fought to pass the assault-weapons ban and has championed closing the background-check loophole at gun shows.

Kerlikowske’s possible role in shaping drug policy for the Obama administration was applauded Tuesday by local medical-marijuana advocates.

In 2003, Kerlikowske opposed a city ballot measure, approved by voters, to make marijuana possession the lowest law-enforcement priority, saying it would create confusion. But in doing so, he noted that arresting people for possessing marijuana for personal use was already not a priority.

“Oh God bless us,” said Joanna McKee, co-founder and director of Green Cross Patient Co-Op, a medical-marijuana patient-advocacy group. “What a blessing — the karma gods are smiling on the whole country, man.”

McKee said Kerlikowske knows the difference between cracking down on the illegal abuse of drugs and allowing the responsible use of marijuana.

Douglas Hiatt, a Seattle attorney and advocate for medical-marijuana patients, said his first preference would be for a physician to oversee national drug policy.

But Kerlikowske would be a vast improvement over past drug czars, who have used the office to carry out the so-called “war on drugs,” Hiatt said.

Kerlikowske is a “very reasonable guy” who would likely bring more liberal policies to the job, Hiatt said.

Related posts

• Stash Interview Special: Former Seattle Police Chief Norm Stamper on Current Chief Gil Kerlikowske as potential Obama “Drug Czar” (0)
• Stash for Thu, Feb 12, 2009 (1)
• Stash for Mon, Jan 12, 2009 (0)