School’s strip-search of teen girl ruled unconstitutional, but girl cannot sue
Thursday, June 25th, 2009 at 11:20 am | By: Radical Russ
WASHINGTON (CNN) — A former middle-school student who was strip-searched by school officials looking for ibuprofen pain medication won a partial victory of her Supreme Court appeal Thursday in a case testing the discretion of officials to ensure classroom safety.
Redding was an eighth-grade honor student in 2003, with no history of disciplinary problems at Safford Middle School, about 127 miles from Tucson, Arizona.
During an investigation into pills found at the school, a student told the vice principal that Redding had given her prescription-strength 400-milligram ibuprofen pills.
The school had a near-zero-tolerance policy for all prescription and over-the-counter medication, including the ibuprofen, without prior written permission.
Redding was pulled from class by Vice Principal Kerry Wilson, escorted to an office and confronted with the evidence. The girl denied the accusations.
A search of Redding’s backpack found nothing. A strip search was conducted by Wilson’s assistant and a school nurse, both females.
Redding was ordered to strip to her underwear and to pull on the elastic of the underwear, so any hidden pills might fall out, according to court records. No drugs were found.
“The strip search was the most humiliating experience I have ever had,” Redding said in an affidavit. “I held my head down so that they could not see that I was about to cry.”
The decision was 8-1.  Justice Clarence Thomas thought the Constitution doesn’t really cover the “preservation of order, discipline and safety in public schools”, so if you want to strip-search 13-year-old girls at school, the Founding Fathers would have been cool with that.  Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens thought the girl should be able to sue the school administrators who humiliated her, but the rest of the court decided that up til now it hasn’t been very clear how much protection the Constitution gives 13-year-old schoolgirls from strip searches, so the administrators couldn’t be reasonably expected to know they couldn’t just do that (if I’m reading SCOTUSblog’s analysis correctly).
So, from now on, there will be more protection for 13-year-old girls in school to not be expected to strip to their panties for school officials – not police, a freakin’ vice principal’s assistant and a school nurse! -Â when a teenage snitch lies about them holding drugs. Â But all you 13-year-old girls who were strip-searched, you have no recourse.
I don’t suppose anybody ever considered just calling the girls’ parents. Â ”Hello, Mrs. Redding? We have a tip your daughter may be holding prescription ibuprofen in violation of our zero-tolerance policy. Â Can you come down to the school, please?” Â No, wait, excuse me, I forgot, we’re talking about drugs; there’s no room for common sense here! Â What am I thinking? Â I just expected someone who takes seriously the phrase “zero tolerance” to show common sense.
Topics: Arizona, ibuprofen, privacy, Savana Redding, SCOTUS, strip search, student, Supreme Court, zero toleranceRelated posts
Loading ...
Fresh Stash V RSS Feed
