WASHINGTON (CNN) — A former middle-school student who was strip-searched by school officials looking for ibuprofen pain medication won a partial victory of her Supreme Court appeal Thursday in a case testing the discretion of officials to ensure classroom safety.

Redding was an eighth-grade honor student in 2003, with no history of disciplinary problems at Safford Middle School, about 127 miles from Tucson, Arizona.

During an investigation into pills found at the school, a student told the vice principal that Redding had given her prescription-strength 400-milligram ibuprofen pills.

The school had a near-zero-tolerance policy for all prescription and over-the-counter medication, including the ibuprofen, without prior written permission.

Redding was pulled from class by Vice Principal Kerry Wilson, escorted to an office and confronted with the evidence. The girl denied the accusations.

A search of Redding’s backpack found nothing. A strip search was conducted by Wilson’s assistant and a school nurse, both females.

Redding was ordered to strip to her underwear and to pull on the elastic of the underwear, so any hidden pills might fall out, according to court records. No drugs were found.

“The strip search was the most humiliating experience I have ever had,” Redding said in an affidavit. “I held my head down so that they could not see that I was about to cry.”

The decision was 8-1.  Justice Clarence Thomas thought the Constitution doesn’t really cover the “preservation of order, discipline and safety in public schools”, so if you want to strip-search 13-year-old girls at school, the Founding Fathers would have been cool with that.  Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens thought the girl should be able to sue the school administrators who humiliated her, but the rest of the court decided that up til now it hasn’t been very clear how much protection the Constitution gives 13-year-old schoolgirls from strip searches, so the administrators couldn’t be reasonably expected to know they couldn’t just do that (if I’m reading SCOTUSblog’s analysis correctly).

So, from now on, there will be more protection for 13-year-old girls in school to not be expected to strip to their panties for school officials – not police, a freakin’ vice principal’s assistant and a school nurse! - when a teenage snitch lies about them holding drugs.  But all you 13-year-old girls who were strip-searched, you have no recourse.

I don’t suppose anybody ever considered just calling the girls’ parents.  ”Hello, Mrs. Redding? We have a tip your daughter may be holding prescription ibuprofen in violation of our zero-tolerance policy.  Can you come down to the school, please?”  No, wait, excuse me, I forgot, we’re talking about drugs; there’s no room for common sense here!  What am I thinking?  I just expected someone who takes seriously the phrase “zero tolerance” to show common sense.

Related posts

• Arizona school violated 13-year-old’s rights in ibuprofen strip search (0)
• Washington State Supreme Court says pot smell isn’t enough to arrest all car’s occupants (0)
• US Supreme Court says passenger can be frisked without cause (0)

An Eisenhower Elementary School student found seeds and a green, leafy substance in another boy’s possession last Friday. The student told a teacher, who then contacted police to verify the questionable substance.

Oklahoma City Police Sargeant Jennifer Wardlow said, “When offiers arrived, they spoke with school administrators who did confirm that they have found a substance they believe to be marijuana on an eight-year-old student.”

Sargeant Wardlow said, “The student was not cited. The administration decided that it was in the best interest of the child to simply notify the parents and suspend the child. The child has been suspended.”

Because the school year is almost over, suspension for the boy will end on the last day of school, which is Friday, May 29, 2009.

via Eight Year Old With Marijuana | KSBI-TV | News.

The amount of marijuana found, according to reports, was 250 milligrams, and that’s including the weight of the seeds found.  I’ve probably got that much weed amongst the lint in my pockets.

I’m not making light of the kid caught with pot.  Children shouldn’t have or use marijuana, unless prescribed by a doctor.  If this was some of his parents’ weed, the parents need to do a better job locking up their stash.  But if he didn’t get it from his parents, then he got it from another student or found it somewhere, and at no point did anyone ever check his or the other student’s or the original purchaser’s ID.

I’m also a bit disturbed that the kid is getting a ten-day suspension from school.  It is just the last weeks of the school year and there’s probably not much going on, but how is this boy helped by getting a ten day head start on summer vacation?

Related posts

• Will Foster extradited to Oklahoma (6)
• Two OSU football players arrested for marijuana possession (1)
• Two Indicted After Chase Ends With Marijuana Bust in Oklahoma (0)

News of the World in the UK is reporting that Olympic swimming sensation Michael Phelps is one of us!

THIS is the astonishing picture which could destroy the career of the greatest competitor in Olympic history.

In our exclusive photo Michael Phelps, who won a record EIGHT gold medals for swimming at the Beijing games last summer, draws from a bong.

And after sporting chiefs announced laws which mean four-year bans for drug-taking, Phelps’ dreams of adding to his overall 14 gold medal tally at the 2012 games in London could already be OVER.

Those dreams seemed the last thing on his mind when he puffed from the bong during two days of partying with students last November, a quiet time in the swimming calendar when athletes would not expect to get tested for drugs.

As he basked in his hero status, Phelps knocked back beers and shots of spirits. And when a student offered him the glass bong engraved with red writing, he did not hesitate, says our source.

Our source said: “You could tell Michael had smoked before. He grabbed the bong and a lighter and knew exactly what to do.

“He looked just as natural with a bong in his hands as he does swimming in the pool. He was the gold medal winner of bong hits. Michael ended up getting a little paranoid, though, because before too long he looked like he was nervous and ran out of the place.”

The US Olympics Committee, who have pledged to clamp down on drug use, refused to comment, as did USA Swimming and Phelps’ coach Bob Bowman.

More surprising still was the World Anti-Doping Agency’s refusal to comment, given that they introduced the four-year ban on sport’s drug users.

Spokesman Clifford Bloxham offered us an extraordinary deal not to publish our story, saying Phelps would become our columnist for three years, host events and get his sponsors to advertise with us.

In return, he asked that we kill Phelps’ bong picture. Bloxham said: “It’s seeing if something potentially very negative for Michael could turn into something very positive for the News of the World.”

So, you wanna explain to me how marijuana smoking will make one a lethargic, unmotivated loser who will never get anywhere in life?  This should be fun, watching sponsors and Olympic and USA Swimming officials trip all over themselves.  I expect to see a special exemption or a sudden new rule that lets firt time offenders skate with some sort of class and community service.  Does anybody really think they are going to end Michael Phelps’ career, the greatest Olympian ever, and a huge marketing and endorsement cash cow, for a picture of him doing something that isn’t even criminal in thirteen states?

Related posts

• Cannabis Civil Rights (10)
• Phelps Apologizes for Marijuana Use (18)
• Is Phelps Getting Off Easy? (0)

A divided US appeals court has ruled an Arizona school violated the constitutional rights of a 13-year-old student by conducting a strip search for ibuprofen.

Suspecting that a student had violated a policy against prescription or over-the-counter drugs without permission, public school officials in Safford, Arizona, ordered a search of Savana Redding.

A school nurse had her remove her clothes, including her bra, and shake her underwear to see if Ms Redding was hiding anything.

The 2003 search, prompted by a tip from another girl, did not find ibuprofen, which is found in common medications like Advil and Motrin to treat pain like cramps and headaches.

Higher doses require a prescription.

Previous court decisions ruled the school did not violate the US Constitution’s Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures because officials have a legitimate interest in protecting students from prescription drugs.

The 6-5 ruling by a panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday overturned an earlier decision, setting out its reasoning in an extensive 75-page ruling with many details on the complications of eighth grade life.

“Directing a 13-year-old girl to remove her clothes, partially revealing her breasts and pelvic area, for allegedly possessing ibuprofen, an infraction that poses an imminent danger to no one, and which could be handled by keeping her in the principal’s office until a parent arrived or simply sending her home, was excessively intrusive,” Justice Kim McLane Wardlaw wrote for the majority.

The majority found flaws in the school’s logic that a tip from another student justified the action.

“The self-serving statement of a cornered teenager facing significant punishment does not meet the heavy burden necessary to justify a search accurately described by the 7th Circuit as ‘demeaning, dehumanizing, undignified, humiliating, terrifying, unpleasant [and] embarrassing’.

“And all this to find prescription-strength ibuprofen pills.

“No legal decision cited to us, or that we could find, permitted a strip search to discover substances regularly available over-the-counter at any convenience store throughout the United States.”

A 6-5 decision!  This poor 13-year-old girl was one judge away from having to fight all the way to the Supreme Court!  When people confront me about my drug war activism, they often ask if I hadn’t thought of “better” causes (climate change, voting machines, poverty, AIDS, whatever) to put my efforts into.  Then I show them cases like this, where the demonization of drugs has led to such alarmist conditioning among school faculty and frightened parents that people actually think it is reasonable to strip-search an adolescent girl on the mere accusation from another student, all over a legal drug!

Related posts

• School’s strip-search of teen girl ruled unconstitutional, but girl cannot sue (6)
• US Supreme Court says passenger can be frisked without cause (0)
• Top Ten Ideas for Change announced in Washington DC (4)