Comments on: This is your Oklahoma police on drugs http://stash.norml.org/this-is-your-oklahoma-police-on-drugs The Growing Truth About Cannabis Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:08:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jake http://stash.norml.org/this-is-your-oklahoma-police-on-drugs/comment-page-1#comment-76049 Jake Thu, 28 Apr 2011 03:30:26 +0000 http://stash.norml.org/?p=9698#comment-76049 Very good rebuttal. However, you spelled "somehwat" incorrectly. Please try to spell check articles in the future. Very good rebuttal. However, you spelled “somehwat” incorrectly. Please try to spell check articles in the future.

]]> By: Life for hash in Oklahoma… but not for raping a 4-year-old | The NORML Stash Blog http://stash.norml.org/this-is-your-oklahoma-police-on-drugs/comment-page-1#comment-76037 Life for hash in Oklahoma… but not for raping a 4-year-old | The NORML Stash Blog Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:06:06 +0000 http://stash.norml.org/?p=9698#comment-76037 [...] yes, the OBNDD, the people who brought you the marijuana “fact sheet” that claims pot today is 30 times stronger than Woodstock Weed and it damages brain cells and [...] [...] yes, the OBNDD, the people who brought you the marijuana “fact sheet” that claims pot today is 30 times stronger than Woodstock Weed and it damages brain cells and [...]

]]> By: If “cops don’t make laws, they just enforce them”, why are police opposing marijuana legalization? | The Daily Daze - The Best Head Shop Online Exclusive Newsfeed http://stash.norml.org/this-is-your-oklahoma-police-on-drugs/comment-page-1#comment-55626 If “cops don’t make laws, they just enforce them”, why are police opposing marijuana legalization? | The Daily Daze - The Best Head Shop Online Exclusive Newsfeed Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:22:18 +0000 http://stash.norml.org/?p=9698#comment-55626 [...] & Dangerous Drugs Control publishes a “fact sheet” on marijuana that states: “Today’s new cultivation methods are producing a drug with up to 30 percent THC, or 3,000 pe... This is in direct contradiction to the DEA’s own figures on marijuana potency which find that [...] [...] & Dangerous Drugs Control publishes a “fact sheet” on marijuana that states: “Today’s new cultivation methods are producing a drug with up to 30 percent THC, or 3,000 pe… This is in direct contradiction to the DEA’s own figures on marijuana potency which find that [...]

]]> By: Jillian http://stash.norml.org/this-is-your-oklahoma-police-on-drugs/comment-page-1#comment-28364 Jillian Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:46:47 +0000 http://stash.norml.org/?p=9698#comment-28364 I think in the end the rule is, if it's marijuana the answer is no, if it's anything else the answer is maybe. I think in the end the rule is, if it’s
marijuana the answer is no, if it’s
anything else the answer is maybe.

]]> By: sameoldwine http://stash.norml.org/this-is-your-oklahoma-police-on-drugs/comment-page-1#comment-28363 sameoldwine Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:45:28 +0000 http://stash.norml.org/?p=9698#comment-28363 Sounds like the alternative is to "change the mandate". Who does that? Congress? Obama? :idk: Sounds like the alternative is to “change the mandate”. Who does that? Congress? Obama? :idk:

]]> By: Radical Russ http://stash.norml.org/this-is-your-oklahoma-police-on-drugs/comment-page-1#comment-28356 Radical Russ Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:17:47 +0000 http://stash.norml.org/?p=9698#comment-28356 That's right. It's kinda like the Olsen decision where we can't allow religious users of cannabis to have their sacrament, because there are so many marijuana users who'd claim it was religious that it would be impossible to enforce anti-marijuana laws. The Indians who use illicit ayahuasca are exempted because there are so few of them and ayahuasca use so rare that their use wouldn't affect anti-drug efforts. Got that? If your personal religious belief in creation and the meaning of life is uncommonly rare, you can take drugs religiously, but if your religious views are shared by too many others, you can't. Sorry, your religion's too popular; too many people agree with you. That’s right. It’s kinda like the Olsen decision where we can’t allow religious users of cannabis to have their sacrament, because there are so many marijuana users who’d claim it was religious that it would be impossible to enforce anti-marijuana laws. The Indians who use illicit ayahuasca are exempted because there are so few of them and ayahuasca use so rare that their use wouldn’t affect anti-drug efforts.

Got that? If your personal religious belief in creation and the meaning of life is uncommonly rare, you can take drugs religiously, but if your religious views are shared by too many others, you can’t. Sorry, your religion’s too popular; too many people agree with you.

]]> By: Radical Russ http://stash.norml.org/this-is-your-oklahoma-police-on-drugs/comment-page-1#comment-28355 Radical Russ Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:14:01 +0000 http://stash.norml.org/?p=9698#comment-28355 Exactly correct. The ONDCP is mandated by law to lie. Always remember that cops and feds are allowed to lie in the pursuit of fighting crime, but if you lie back to them, it is "obstruction of justice" or "perjury". Exactly correct. The ONDCP is mandated by law to lie. Always remember that cops and feds are allowed to lie in the pursuit of fighting crime, but if you lie back to them, it is “obstruction of justice” or “perjury”.

]]> By: Jillian http://stash.norml.org/this-is-your-oklahoma-police-on-drugs/comment-page-1#comment-28325 Jillian Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:15:26 +0000 http://stash.norml.org/?p=9698#comment-28325 Ron Paul tried to call out the ONDCP for the lies they tell. In '03 he wrote to the general accounting office and was basically told that they would do nothing because lying could be considered to fall within the ONDCP's mandate of "taking such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use" of marijuana. http://tr.im/pCUz I guess the same logic would apply to shooting each of us in the face. Ron Paul tried to call out the ONDCP for the lies they tell. In ’03 he wrote to the general accounting office and was basically told that they would do nothing because lying could be considered to fall within the ONDCP’s mandate of “taking such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use” of marijuana.

http://tr.im/pCUz

I guess the same logic would apply to shooting each of us in the face.

]]> By: sameoldwine http://stash.norml.org/this-is-your-oklahoma-police-on-drugs/comment-page-1#comment-28309 sameoldwine Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:56:00 +0000 http://stash.norml.org/?p=9698#comment-28309 Russ, didn't the 5 federal judge @ Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals say that the law was unenforceable? The decision was 3-2. Typical governmental BS. You can't call the government on "lies" even if you can prove that they are because then every one would want to "call them" on every little thing. :yuck: :thdown: Are these judges left over from the dark ages? :dead: Russ, didn’t the 5 federal judge @ Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals say that the law was unenforceable? The decision was 3-2.

Typical governmental BS. You can’t call the government on “lies” even if you can prove that they are because then every one would want to “call them” on every little thing. :yuck: :thdown:

Are these judges left over from the dark ages? :dead:

]]> By: Urb Age http://stash.norml.org/this-is-your-oklahoma-police-on-drugs/comment-page-1#comment-28304 Urb Age Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:56:22 +0000 http://stash.norml.org/?p=9698#comment-28304 Great post Russ. Im with Jillian, lets sue!!!! Great post Russ. Im with Jillian, lets sue!!!!

]]>